|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1361
   |
Posted - 2013.01.11 18:03:00 -
[1] - Quote
Hell yes.
Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |
Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1370
|
Posted - 2013.01.13 10:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
Lord MuffloN wrote:I have seen few men as articulate and sharp as Malcanis, having had the pleasure of working with him I must say I find few candidates as qualified or suited for the position, and if I can spare a few votes myself from voting outside any TEST candidate, Malcanis is my go to guy.
Can't you guys just skip the messing around and make Malcanis the HBC bloc vote candidate this time around?
Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |
Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1377
|
Posted - 2013.01.14 12:51:00 -
[3] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Kinis Deren wrote:Would you care to reveal your thoughts concerning moon goo (specifically, from tech moons)? Do you think the alchemy changes went far enough, do you think a geographical redistribution of tech moons is warranted or do you have something else in mind? The current situation with tech moons is still DumbGäó Obviously alchemy has helped to mitigate the issues, but the fundamental problems are still there, most specifically the terrible distribution of Technetium moons. What I'd really like to see is the solution proposed by a clever person whose name temporarily escapes me, which is to basically completely redo the distribution of the R64s, so that each R64 is heavily concentrated in a single quadrant of the map. And then to redo the moongoo requirements for tech 2 items such that each race relies on a different R64. So it might be possible for a coalition to dominate the R64 for Caldari ships or Minmatar ships, but it would require them to control the whole of 0.0 to monopolise the top earning moons in the way that we see now. In any case, the top-earning moons still earn far too much. Alliances should derive their wealth from the activity of their memberbase, not from lifeless structures which are milked by an elite few.
Just restoring the supremacy of r64s would go a long way towards fixing moon materials - nobody complained about moon distribution when dyspro and promethium were kings of the hill since although there were good regions and bad regions they were much more widely distributed, its only when that title fell to a regionalised r32 material that it became an issue. Moonshuffling has its own set of associated problems - not least that it hands the initiative to large organised groups who have the manpower to quickly scan down areas of space for the new moon locations (there's still no complete and accurate moon map after nearly 10 years).
R64 supremacy plus some secondary method of sourcing materials (whether that be ring mining or something else) to allow bottom-up supply of the market would put Eve in a much healthier position.
Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |
Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1392
|
Posted - 2013.01.16 12:27:00 -
[4] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Speaking of exiting Beta, Ytterbium's post on updating EVE's embarrasingly antiquated PvE is something that I absolutely intend to relentlessly follow up on, as this has been one of my pet issues almost since I started playing EVE. It has been 10 years. It's not too soon for EVE to have PvE that's more than a blatant "To Do: rats" placeholder.
While that is an interesting and useful post, it's also rather irritating that it was tucked away on page 16 of a megathread in one niche (though moderately popular) subforum.
I hesitate to say that every time a Dev posts it should be accompanied by pop-ups and sirens and firework displays, but if you hadn't linked it I'd never have known the post existed.
Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |
Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1463
|
Posted - 2013.01.23 12:34:00 -
[5] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Callduron wrote:sov war to become more about ship to ship How would this be done in a way which isn't exploitable?
1v1 honour duels at the sun, first alliance to 100 kills wins sov.
Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |
Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1682
|
Posted - 2013.03.10 13:14:00 -
[6] - Quote
No but you see highsec is supposed to be the best at absolutely everything with no downsides whatsoever, just like CCP intended!
Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |
Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1871
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 20:03:00 -
[7] - Quote
Grats and things.
Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |
Scatim Helicon
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
1871
|
Posted - 2013.04.29 20:20:00 -
[8] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Scatim Helicon wrote:Grats and things. I got my first CSM hatemail already GÖÑ
You'd better share.
Titans were never meant to be "cost effective", its a huge ****.-á- CCP Oveur, 2006
~If you want a picture of the future of WiS, imagine a spaceship, stamping on an avatar's face. Forever. |
|
|
| |
|